What Has Gone So Wrong at Zipcar – and the UK Car-Sharing Market Dead?

A volunteer food project in Rotherhithe has been delivering a large number of prepared dishes weekly for two years to elderly residents and vulnerable locals in southeast London. However, their operations face major disruption by the news that they will lose cars and vans on New Year’s Day.

This organization had relied on Zipcar, the app-based vehicle rental service that customers to access its cars via smartphone. It caused shock across London when it declared it would cease its UK operations from 1 January.

This means many helpers cannot collect food from a major food charity, which gathers excess produce from supermarkets, cafes and restaurants. Other options are further away, costlier, or do not offer the same convenient access.

“It’s going to be affected massively,” stated Vimal Pandya, the community kitchen’s founder. “My team and I are worried about the operational hurdle we will face. A lot of people like ours will face difficulties.”

“Faced with this reality, everyone is concerned and thinking: ‘How are we going to carry on?”

A Significant Setback for Urban Car-Sharing

The community kitchen’s drivers are part of over 500,000 people in London who were car club members, who could be left without easy use to vehicles, without the hassle and cost of ownership. Most of those people were probably with Zipcar, which held a dominant position in the city.

The planned closure, pending consultation with employees, is a big blow to hopes that car sharing in cities could cut the need for private vehicle ownership. Yet, some analysts have noted that Zipcar’s exit need not spell the end for the concept in Britain.

The Promise of Shared Mobility

Car sharing is prized by city planners and environmentalists as a way of mitigating the problems associated with vehicle ownership. Most cars sit as two-tonne dead weights on the side of the road for the vast majority of the time, using up space. They also involve large carbon emissions to produce, and people who do not own cars tend to walk, cycle and take public transport more. That helps urban areas – easing congestion and pollution – and improves public health through more exercise.

What Went Wrong?

Zipcar was founded in 2000 before being bought by the American rental giant Avis Budget in 2013. Zipcar’s UK revenues were minimal compared with its parent company's total earnings, and a loss that reached £11.7m in 2024 gave little incentive to continue.

The parent company stated the closure is part of a “wider restructuring across our international business, where we are taking targeted actions to streamline operations, improve returns”.

Its latest financial reports said revenues had declined as drivers took less frequent, shorter trips. “This trend reflect the continuing effect of the cost-of-living crisis, which continues to suppress demand for non-essential services,” it said.

The Capital's Specific Challenges

However, industry observers noted that London has specific problems that made it difficult for the sector to succeed.

  • Patchwork Policies: With numerous local councils, car-club operators face a mosaic of different procedures and costs that complicate operations.
  • Congestion Charge: The closure comes as electric cars start paying London’s congestion charge, adding unavoidable costs.
  • Unequal Parking Fees: Locals in some boroughs pay as little as £63 for a annual electric car parking permit. A floating car club would pay over £1,100 per year, creating a significant barrier.

“We should literally be charged one-twentieth of a private parking cost,” argued Robert Schopen of Co Wheels. “We remove vehicles. We introduce cleaner models in their place.”

A European Example

Nations in Europe offer models for London to follow. Germany introduced national shared mobility laws in 2017, providing a unified system for parking, support and waivers. Now, the country has 5.4 shared cars per 10,000 people, while France has 2.1 and Belgium has 6.3. The UK lags behind at 0.7.

“The evidence shows is that shared mobility around the world, especially in Europe, is expanding,” commented Bharath Devanathan of Invers.

He suggested authorities should start to treat car sharing as a form of public transport, and integrate it with train and bus stations. He added that one unnamed client was already seriously considering entering the London market: “There will be fill this gap.”

What Comes Next?

Other players can be split into two camps:

  1. Company-Owned Fleets: Which maintain their own cars. This includes Denmark’s GreenMobility, France’s Free2Move, and Germany’s Miles Mobility.
  2. Person-to-Person Rentals: Which allow users to hire out their own vehicles via an app – a kind of Airbnb for cars. Examples Britain’s Hiyacar and the US’s Getaround and Turo.

One company, a US-headquartered peer-to-peer platform, is already weighing up the UK gap. Rory Brimmer, its UK managing director, said there was a “big opportunity” to win more users. “A space exists that is going to need to be filled, because London still needs to move,” Brimmer said.

However, it could take a while for other players to build momentum. For now, more people may feel forced to buy cars, and others across London will be left without access.

For the volunteers in Rotherhithe, the next month will be a scramble to find a solution. The delivery problem caused by Zipcar’s exit highlights the wider implications of its departure on vital services and the prospects of shared mobility in the UK.

Julie Stephens
Julie Stephens

Elara Vance is a novelist and writing coach with a passion for storytelling and helping aspiring authors find their unique voice.